Showing posts with label Kootenays. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kootenays. Show all posts

Sunday, July 8, 2012

High Water

 
 A cool, wet spring accompanied with unusual amounts of rain contributed to one of the highest water levels in Kootenay Lake this year since 1974.


This picture shows how close the high water came to the intake building which houses the electronics for the pumps.


One radio commentator I heard today noted that if it wasn't for the dams on the Kootenay River, the water level in the Lake could have been as much as 7 feet higher.


Friday, December 2, 2011

Field Trip - Ymir Treatment System

As part of my own little field-trip day, I visited the water treatment system at Ymir. This is a small community of 200+ people between Nelson and Salmo. It gets it's water from a surface supply (a stream west of town) and has a new treatment system operated by RDCK.

The Regional District took over Ymir's water system a few years ago, and installed a modern treatment system. I visited the plant with one of the RDCK's techs who was there to do some routine testing.

The plant pumps stream water through 3 large tanks that contain sand filters, then through a set of 5 micron and 1 micron cartridge filters, then through a set of parallel UV tubes and finally past a chlorine injector system. All system parameters are monitored in real time and the computer controlling this can be accessed by the techs from any of their computers.


RDCK has had, up to this fall, 16 water systems that they manage. After this fall/winter, they will be adding 3 more systems.

Monday, October 24, 2011

Water Meters - Four Years On

This is the long version of the Society's progress through our water meter project, started back in 2007, written to provide some historical perspective and a reminder of how much work such a project involves. One starting point: the Water Society is owned by it's members which includes property owners in the Subdivision. Homeowners must become members before they can connect to the water system. There are some members who have not built homes on their lots yet, but the vast majority of Society members live in their homes in the subdivision. There is an elected Board that manages the water system and a number of members volunteer to help maintain and operate the system on a day-to-day basis.

The Basic Chronology:

Summer of 2007 - at the Annual General Meeting of Society members, it was voted by a large majority to proceed with water meters and to investigate possible grants to help with the costs.

Summer of 2008 - during this summer, most meters were installed. Some went inside homes, some went in underground boxes near the street shut-off valves. In all cases, the work was done to accommodate homeowners. Some did not want the meters inside their homes and they were accommodated. In a couple of instances, inside locations would have been difficult to use. In one or two cases, there were yard standpipes between the street and the house so we didn't interfere with those either. By fall, most connections were on water meters. During this time, information was sent to all members addressing, once again, the reasons for meters, how the billing would work and so on. Federal Grant money was obtained that paid for many of the costs of the project.

Calendar year 2009 - during this year, meters were read quarterly and "sample statements" were sent to all residents indicating what their water use was and what it would cost assuming the rate structure was approved by the members. During this year, all connections were billed using the flat rate system, using a rate that had been in effect since 2003.

AGM 2009 - at the annual AGM, the proposed rate structure was presented to the members and it was approved by a nearly unaminous vote. The approved rate structure was used in our application to the Water Comptroller in Victoria and was allowed. Also during this time, the meters helped to identify a few water leaks that had been previously unknown.

Calendar year 2010 - the new rate structure took effect at the beginning of 2010. The rate structure included a daily connection rate and three levels based on quarterly consumption.

Calendar year 2011 - one outside meter was moved inside to a resident's basement, a new house was constructed which involved substantial discussion about metering, again, and the Society approved, at it's AGM, the first real rate incrrease since 2003.

Why We Meter:

The decision to install water meters was based on several considerations:

1) To help reduce water use - this is not because we worry about the amount of water in Kootenay Lake, but how much water we can store in our reservoir, our pumping capacity and the cost and work associated with supplying our water. Our system is run by a relatively small number of volunteers who do all the work, subsidizing, by their labours, everyone who contributes nothing.

2) Water is a commodity - we pay for other commodities based on how much we use. There is no reason why water should be treated any differently.

3) Fairness - everyone who uses smaller amounts of water is subsidizing the relative few who use lots more water, as long as we remain on a flat rate system.

Opposition to Meters:

Obviously, not everyone saw the need for meters from the outset, and a small but vocal minority has seized on every opportunity and every argument, no matter how farfetched, to oppose the project. The arguments, basically, have been as follows:

1) There is lots of water in Kootenay Lake. True, but that's the problem. It's in the Lake, 400 feet below where it's used, and it costs money to operate the infrastructure to pump, filter and treat this water. Everyone should be payng their fair share of these costs, based on how much water they are using.

2) Meters were forced on us. Not true. This was the most democratic, fair and open process imaginable (see above). PRWUS is a privately owned system and members voted to abopt water meters. There was no pressure on us from the outside and we had no discussions with anyone from outside about the project.

3) The meters aren't certified. Again, not true. They aren't CSA certified, but, as parts of the water distribution system, they don't need to be, unlike plumbing fixtures which DO need to be CSA approved. The meters are ANSI/NSF 61 certified and AWWA C700 certified. If you want to know what these are, just ask.

4) Just run the pumps 24/7/365 if you need more water. Surely, this can't be a serious suggestion. Perhaps it makes sense if you're not involved in volunteering to help run the system (cleaning filters, maintaining the system), or contributing your fair share of the operational costs (hydro, chlorine, filters), or dealing with the replacement costs in a system that is over 30 years old and would wear out even faster if used in this way.

5) Water meters are just a money grab. Not true. For FY 2010, the total revenue is almost exactly the same as it was before meters. True, some people pay more, but others pay less, just like anything else. It should be pointed out that our Society, like most small water systems in BC, does not have enough money put aside to deal with a major breakdown or catastrophe. Almost no water systems are charging enough for their water now. Systems recently taken over by the Regional District are paying 2 to 3 times as much as we are. We are constantly being encouraged by Victoria to make sure we are charging enough $$ to pay for future repairs to the system.

6) We don't like meters. Fair enough. I'd rather not have my electricty metered. Honest, I'd be careful about my use of power. Right.

At one point during the meter project, one resident filed a complaint with the Provincial Ombudsman. The complaint was rejected once the Ombudsman learned about the process the Society had followed (see above). At another point, a local plumber refused to work with the meters because he claimed they were not CSA approved. This has been settled. We also have - in writing - the Regional District's Building Department's position on water meters and our right, as the water utility, to choose our equipment and install it as we see fit. Appeals have been made to the Water Comptroller in Victoria opposing meters in certain residences. The Comptroller suggested that we could put the meters outside and charge the owners for the additional cost. We didn't go that far, although we could have.

In summary, it's been a long, sometimes tiring journey, but we can't imagine turning back. Meters for water are coming, even to this part of BC. Water quality regulations mean that supplying water to the public can't be done the way it was 50 years ago. Most people who look at this issue sensibly and rationally, will arrive at the same conclusion as we did.

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Other Water Systems

A few weeks ago I had the opportunity to visit and examine a small water system in a neighbourhood near ours. This system services approximately the same number of homes as ours and it attracted my attention because they had recently spent quite a sum of money improving the infrastructure that was in place there.

Basically, their project involved extending the intakes of their pumps well out into the lake and to a depth of around 100 ft (a requirement of Interior Health) as well as building a new control system, building and treatment process.

The main piping used was schedule 80 PVC and the treatment uses UV only with a turbidity meter. The cost of the improvements was in the neighbourhood of $150,000.

What this system still does not have is a decent reservoir for storage. I didn't see what was in place, but I was told that there were two small tanks with a combined capacity of around 10,000 gallons. Because of the single treatment process (UV), they had to install a turbidity meter and when the lake water does become too cloudy, they must issue a boil water advisory. The only way to avoid this would be to install a filtration system as well.

This system is community owned and it is my intention to visit a system recently taken over and renovated by the Regional District. More information to follow.

Sunday, June 26, 2011

RDCK Concerned about New Water Regulations

[as reported in The Valley Voice, June 15, 2011].

Earlier in June, Interior Health's Medical Health Officer met with RDCK's Rural Affairs Committee. It appears that most of the discussion centered around drinking water, specifically the new water regulations and the pressure those regulations will put on small communities and small water systems.

If anyone wants to see the effect of these new regulations, one needs go no further than the South Slocan, where a very expensive system is now in place (rumored to have cost in excess of $1 million). Never mind that almost no-one there wanted the new system; they have it now and will be paying for it. In part, this happened because the South Slocan water system was to be taken over by RDCK. Pressure was applied by Interior Health on the Regional District to fix the system so it met the standards of the Drinking Water Protection Act. Against many objections, the work was done.

It might be worth pointing out that the new regulations require two methods of treatment. Our system, owned and operated by PRWUS, has that kind of arrangement, a filtration system down to 1 micron and a chlorination system. We also monitor chlorine levels on a daily basis and water samples are sent in regularly to be tested for the presence of bacteria and other pathogens. So, for the time being, our system meets the requirements set out in the new regulations under the Drinking Water Protection Act.

I think it's clear from this that the Government is prepared to insist that drinking water quality across the province be improved. It's simply not going to be good enough to argue that "we've drunk the water from that lake (river, bog, whatever) for years and never had a problem with it". It's also clear that the Government won't be paying for these improvements, where they are needed. Our view is that it's always good to stay ahead of these things and never get in the position of having to play catch-up with the whims of Governments. Like most things connected with Government, they usually cost you money.

Saturday, April 3, 2010

Water Conservation becomes news in the West Kootenays

CBC News played a brief interview this morning with the mayor of Castlegar. That city has committed to a completion of a water meter installation project within 5 years. The mayor's comments were related to general water conservation, the cost of treatment and how reducing water use would save the community lots of money.

Thursday, June 19, 2008

BC Water Quality Makes the News

"BC has far too many boil water edicts: Ombudsman". In a recently released report, BC's Ombudsman criticizes the slow pace of improvements in the regulation of safe drinking water standards in this province. Read the full story in The Province and The Canadian Press.

Thursday, June 5, 2008

Kootenay Water in the News

The Valley Voice - June 5, 2008 - South Slocan moving closer towards water system upgrades". This system of 66 connections has been living with a boil water advisory for 16 years. Changes now in progress may see that advisory lifted. It won't be cheap, though. The system, owned now by RDCK, needs over $400,000 of capital investment, about 25% of which will be borrowed. Users may have to pay around $600/year for their water, double what they pay now. When completed, their system will have a new water mainline, a new treatment system (chlorination and UV), a new reservoir, a new hydrant system and a booster pump station to raise line pressure for several houses. This is essentially what PRWUS members have had in place for several years and the reason why we haven't had a boil water advisory in that time.

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Kootenay Water Quality Questioned....Again

The Valley Voice - May 8, 2008 - "Interior Health speaks to RDCK about new water regulations". Concerns about the availability for safe drinking water have finally made it to the Kootenays in the form of the new Drinking Water Protection Act. The latest statistics show there are 72 Boil Water Advisories in Kootenay/Boundary, 50-60% of the region's water users are on surface water systems and most systems in the region use no water treatment or only one treatment system. It was also noted that many people get their water from Kootenay Lake, a body of water into which more and more septic system effluent is ending up in the Lake and where the is more boat traffic. Some of that traffic is discharging waste water into the Lake.

RDCK Lifts Moratorium

The Valley Voice - May 8, 2008 - "RDCK Votes in water and sewer acquisition policy". Residents will know that RDCK has had a moratorium on taking over community water and sewer systems. Late in April, the Regional District started a process that will eventually lift that moratorium. Details are still to come, but basically RDCK would take over ownership of the system and all assets for $1. Users of the system would have to agree to pay the rates established by the engineering report.